Editorial
Content Review Process
The step-by-step process every clinical page goes through before publication.
Step 1 — Source aggregation
An editor compiles all relevant AUA / EAU guideline statements, Mayo Clinic / Cleveland Clinic / Johns Hopkins patient-education pages, NIDDK and FDA summaries, and recent PubMed-indexed peer-reviewed reviews on the topic.
Step 2 — Plain-language drafting
A medical writer drafts the page at a target Flesch reading level of 60–70 (roughly 8th–10th grade), preserving technical accuracy.
Step 3 — Clinical review
A board-certified clinician reviews the draft for clinical accuracy, balance, and any missing safety information. Comments are addressed and re-reviewed until sign-off.
Step 4 — Editorial review
An editor checks for promotional language, balance across treatment options, source-link integrity, and consistency with our Editorial Policy.
Step 5 — Publication and dated review
Each page is published with a last-reviewed date in the schema.org metadata. Pages are re-reviewed at minimum annually.
Step 6 — Reader feedback
We monitor reader corrections and republish updated content with a transparent changelog when material changes are made.
Medical Review & Editorial Oversight
Reviewed by Dr. Ariel Ortiz, MD, FACS, FASMBS
All clinical content on ProstateHealth.mx is reviewed for medical accuracy, patient safety, balance, and consistency with contemporary evidence-based guidelines.
- 30+ years of clinical experience
- Founder, Obesity Control Center
- Founder, Hospital CYNTAR
- Professor of Surgery & Clinical Medicine
- International educator and lecturer
- Contributor to surgical quality & safety initiatives
Disclaimer: Medical review does not establish a physician–patient relationship. All diagnosis and treatment decisions must be made directly between the patient and a licensed physician.